Ghandi and Hellen Keller Burning in Hell for All Eternity?

The President of Fuller Theological Seminary, Richard Mouw leader of one of the world's best seminary's, takes a crack at this, and responds to a Baptist theologian who says there's no other honest Christian position than Ghandi being in hell. Mouw offers caution:

http://www.netbloghost.com/mouw/?p=21

Whose position do you find yourself more sympathetic to? The Baptist guy's, or Mouw's?

My own take on this:

I'm uncomfortable opening up a can of worms that someone can be "in Christ" without themselves proclaiming Christ...however there's the other can of worms that can be opened in the strict absolutist position as well which Mouw is concerned about. Logically, if we open the door (rightfully as 99.9% of Christians believe) for infants, mentally disabled, etc, you'd think this would apply in some sense to those who live in forced ignorance their whole lives as well. So in actuality, all Christians--including predestinationist Calvinists--allow for some sort of grace and salvation of peoples who are not able to process propositional doctrinal formulas. And if we take the position that the unborn as people, then I certainly don't see much logic in punishing the spirits of fetuses for eternity. Ghandi's case would be a bit different since he did in fact know about Christ. Yet at the same time he bore much more fruit than most professed Christians who have lived.

Can grace be obtained only by intellectually believing Evangelical-friendly doctrinal propositions? Is the guy who professes Christ and bears little fruit infinitely better off than the other guy who bears a ton of fruit but doesn't believe the right intellectual propositions? Can the latter group still be covered by grace and somehow be "in Christ"? I suppose at best I'd maybe be privately and cautiously optimistic that some could be covered by grace in such a way, but for those I encounter who are able to hear the gospel, I'll stick to preaching repentance and born again theology. I'll leave the rest in God's hands, though I won't be as dogmatic as the Baptist guy and find myself agreeing with Mouw--Not a univeralist, are consequences for those who reject the gospel, but that we shouldn't either underestimate God's grace and how he handles some of these difficult questions. I think it would be important to note that Mouw or others would still maintain that the ignorant or whoever would hypothetically be covered by God's grace and that the Cross event is still central to this. But how this would work I really don't know, which is why I wouldn't feel comfortable preaching it.